Every AI ambient scribe on the market, DAX, Nuance, Abridge, Ambience, Suki, DeepScribe, Freed, solves the same problem in the same way. It listens to the visit, transcribes the conversation, and hands the physician a draft to review. The workflow is identical to the dictation services physicians have used since the 1960s. The only thing that changed is who does the typing.
The evidence is damning. 31% of AI-generated ambient notes contain at least one detected hallucination. 84.4% require physician editing before signing. The first randomized clinical trial found users saved just 41 seconds per note, a 9.5% reduction, while DAX Copilot’s savings did not reach statistical significance. AI scribes have increased note length by 20.6% versus traditional documentation, making the bloat crisis worse. Penn Medicine’s Net Promoter Score for AI scribes was exactly zero: 35% promoters and 35% detractors.
ENCOUNTERai doesn’t listen. It predicts. You give it the clinical facts, as much or as little as you want. It generates a complete encounter note in your style, your voice, your structure, in seconds. No hallucinations to catch. No transcription to edit. No 30-year-old workflow dressed in new clothes.
Sources: Palm et al., Frontiers in AI (2025); Lukac et al., NEJM AI (2025); Duggan et al., JAMA Network Open (2025); UCI Health. Full citations in AHI White Paper Part 2.